What does the word “mainstream” mean to you? To most of us, it would describe the bulk of people most representative of American society. Right? Yet liberals use the term to describe anyone who doesn’t agree with them. Judge Alito is the most recent example. The charge, “outside the mainstream,” is tossed around with abandon by the likes of Barbara Boxer, Teddy Kennedy, Dianne Feinstein, and John Kerry. The Democrats seem to have co-opted the word as their own personal mantra, “outside the mainstream” to describe all conservatives.

This “mainstream” that they talk about is obviously different from my personal experience. If ever there was a group that is way “outside the mainstream” that most of us know, it’s this crowd.

First and foremost they are all multi-millionaires. According to their example, you must first get filthy rich in order to understand the problems of the poorer element in our society. Teddy screams that Alito will not stand up for the “little man.” Mary Jo Kopechne, only child of an insurance salesman, was the last known contact he had with such people, and his interest then was not financial.

Even Dianne, the least hypocritical of the above group, showed us how snuggly close she is to the “mainstream’ by buying a $16 million dollar house in San Francisco to go with her $6 million Georgetown pad and her $7 million Tahoe place. Sure, Dianne, you have a great feel for the “mainstream” of American society. Perhaps the Grayline Tour can take those of us who are really in “the mainstream” by the S.F. house. I ‘m sure you wouldn’t mind us gawking at it from the street. That’s as close to that kind of wealth as any of us “true mainstreamers” will ever get.

Not to mention “loser” Kerry and Barbara Boxer.

Such hypocrites!